Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Siedsma v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04247
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Siedsma
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Abbott v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03108
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M Abbott
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Richie v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50039
Plaintiff:
Cynthia B. Richie
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Riewski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv03614
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Riewski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Obrien v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Obrien
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Newhouse Bacheller v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06912
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lynn Newhouse Bacheller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Quist v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv50401
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M. Quist
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Siedsma v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv05163
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Siedsma
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Andrade (Yuqui) v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Andrade (Yuqui)
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Atkins v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Atkins
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
