Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Davis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Chad Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rintoul v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv02435
Plaintiff:
Shawn Jeremy Rintoul
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cox v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv01861
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Paul Cox
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McKeon v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
Jeremy S. McKeon
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carter v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01477
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Malik v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00588
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Malik
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Malik v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02932
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Malik
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Aguirre v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02092
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A. Aguirre
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
