Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Peacock v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv03254
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Andrew Peacock
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barber v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv50346
Plaintiff:
Jeremy S. Barber
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Katro v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv14071
Plaintiff:
Jeremy P. Katro
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rogers v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv04888
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Rogers
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Durbin v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv03161
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Durbin
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Howell v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv04136
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Howell
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
House v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv05342
Plaintiff:
Jeremy E. House
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jelderks v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jelderks
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Katro v. Saul
as 1:2020cv07193
Defendant:
Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Katro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Sibert v. Saul
as 1:2019cv02837
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A Sibert and Jeremy Alan Sibert, Sr.
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
