Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gurule v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Gurule
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Chandler v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Lisa Chandler
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Thomas v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01583
Plaintiff:
Lisa Renee Thomas
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ramirez v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv01734
Plaintiff:
Lisa Michelle Ramirez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Thomas v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of SSA
as 2:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Lisa Renee Thomas
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of SSA and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Keith v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv01110
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Lisa M Keith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Carrara v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv01107
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Lisa M Carrara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Trillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00129
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Trillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jackson v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00438
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Dara Lisa Jackson
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Giuliano v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01416
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Giuliano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
