Cases 1 - 10 of 11
McKenzie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
Colleen McKenzie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McKenzie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv01594
Plaintiff:
David R. McKenzie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McKenzie v. United States Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 1:2019cv21331
Plaintiff:
Elsa McKenzie
Defendant:
United States Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
The Estate of Elsa McKenzie v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 1:2019cv21344
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Elsa McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
McKenzie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2016cv01972
Plaintiff:
David R. McKenzie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McKenzie v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2012cv61596
Plaintiff:
Tammy McKenzie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
McKenzie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv22751
Plaintiff:
James Lucius McKenzie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
McKenzie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2012cv01355
Plaintiff:
Bridget McKenzie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McKenzie v. Astrue
as 9:2009cv80947
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. McKenzie
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McKenzie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2009cv00228
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey George McKenzie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
