Cases 1 - 10 of 42
COE v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE ROSE COE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Washenko v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv01359
Plaintiff:
Maggie Rose Washenko
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Winchester v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Hannah Rose Winchester
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Washenko v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv02800
Plaintiff:
Maggie Rose Washenko
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00909
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Theresa Rose Walker
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Turk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00492
Plaintiff:
Amanda Rose Turk
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv03051
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Rose Murray
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dubis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv14306
Plaintiff:
YVONNE ROSE DUBIS
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Stokes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2020cv61485
Plaintiff:
Rosely Altagracia Stokes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Pena v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00057
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rose Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
