Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv01578
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lynn Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv01811
Plaintiff:
Anthony Denard Woods
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2021cv81516
Plaintiff:
Nancy Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0402
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00667
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Alfred Keith Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00387
Plaintiff:
Katherine A Wood and Katherine Antoinette Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv00633
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Venola Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wood, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv02143
Plaintiff:
Richard B Wood, Jr. and Richard B. Wood
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv00963
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lynn Wood
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Woods v. Berryhill
as 0:2019cv60918
Plaintiff:
Steven Woods
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2017cv02495
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
