Cases 91 - 100 of 123
BANKS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
RAYNOLDO BANKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERSICO et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2011cv01512
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSE PERSICO and ANGELA CLEMENTE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JETER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv00996
Plaintiff:
PERCY L. JETER, JR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MARINO v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2011cv00813
Plaintiff:
VINCENT MICHAEL MARINO
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SMITH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2010cv01622
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENSON v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2010cv01586
Petitioner:
ROBERT L. STEVENSON
Respondent:
M. MITCHELL and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. GARRETT et al
as 1:2010cv01589
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. SIMPSON
Defendant:
JUDITH SIMON GARRETT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv01590
Plaintiff:
REDELK IRONHORSE THOMAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUDD v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv01547
Petitioner:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, HARELY G. LAPPIN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JUDD v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2010cv01549
Petitioner:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
