Cases 151 - 160 of 207
GILL v. DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2011cv00767
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and DC PUBLIC LIBRARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. WASHINGTON DC PUBLIC LIBRARY et al
as 1:2011cv00740
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DC PUBLIC LIBRARY, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY et al
as 1:2011cv00735
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
as 1:2011cv00578
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. STOKES et al
as 1:2011cv00534
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
BRIAN STOKES and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. NORTON
as 1:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAILS v. QUATTLEBAUM et al
as 1:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant:
KENNETH QUATTLEBAUM, DAVID PATE, WILLIAM LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AEM (HOLDINGS), INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv01942
Plaintiff:
AEM (HOLDINGS), INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF STATE, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ARMOR HOLDINGS, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2010mc00367
Interested Party:
ISRAEL WEISLER, YOCHANAN R. COHEN, JOHN GREGORY GODSEY and others
Petitioner:
ARMOR HOLDINGS, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
NAILS v. QUATTLEBAUM, et al.
as 1:2010cv01584
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant:
KENNETH QUATTLEBAUM, DAVID PATE, WILLIAM LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
