Cases 151 - 160 of 10,054
Boothroyd v. Credit Pros International, LLC, The
as 1:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
Angelika C. Boothroyd
Defendant:
Credit Pros International, LLC, The
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organizations Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Durant v. Solidquote LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02826
Plaintiff:
Barbara Durant
Defendant:
Solidquote LLC and The Lead Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rowland v. USA
as 1:2023cv02808
Plaintiff:
Dustin Alan Rowland
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Savelkoul v. Wormuth
as 1:2023cv02792
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Savelkoul
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Matthews v. Global Screening Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02773
Plaintiff:
Taquilla Matthews
Defendant:
Global Screening Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Morrison v. Real Debt Solution, LLC, The
as 1:2023cv02777
Plaintiff:
Susan E. Morrison
Defendant:
Real Debt Solution, LLC, The doing business as The Credit Repair Shop and Real Debt Solution, LLC, The doing business as Credit Repair Shop, The
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organizations Act
Ulery v. Happy Panda, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02786
Plaintiff:
David Ulery
Defendant:
Happy Panda, Inc. and Robert Selfors
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
