Cases 11 - 20 of 120
HAYES MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC v. EICHELBERG et al
as 0:2023cv60748
Plaintiff:
HAYES MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
AMY EICHELBERG, ALLISON PATIERNO, SCOTT SIMON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01794
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Benefytt Technologies, Inc. f/k/a Health Insurance Innovations, Inc., Health Plan Intermediaries Holdings, LLC, HealthPocket, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0052 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thomas-Lawson v. Direct Recovery Services, LLC
as 6:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Amy Thomas-Lawson
Defendant:
Direct Recovery Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Teems v. Candy
as 5:2021mc00029
In Re:
Johnnie Raymond Candy
Plaintiff:
Lynda F. Teems
Defendant:
Amy Candy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Thomas-Lawson v. 24/7 Logistic Services, LLC
as 0:2021cv62048
Plaintiff:
Amy Thomas-Lawson
Defendant:
24/7 Logistic Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
