Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 1:2019cv05433
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc.
Defendant:
Office for Civil Rights, Roger Severino, Alex M. Azar II and others
Amicus Curiae:
the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv05435
Plaintiff:
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association and Public Health Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Roger Severino and others
Amicus Curiae:
the American Muslim Health Professionals, Institute for Policy Integrity, The American Medical Association and others
Interested Party:
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sell v. United States of America et al
as 2:2019cv03105
Plaintiff:
Michael Cassell and Benjamin Sell
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, United States Merchant Marine Academy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2019cv04676
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Public Health Solutions, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Institute for Policy Integrity, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Dr. Regina Renee Frost and Christian Medical and Dental Associations
Consolidated Defendant:
Roger Severino, Office for Civil Rights and Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Bright Kids NYC Inc. v. Kelly et al
as 1:2019cv01175
Defendant:
LectureLab, Inc., Taylor Kelly, Sara Javed and others
Plaintiff:
Bright Kids NYC Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Bige Doruk
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Yu v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2018cv05560
Defendant:
United States Maritime Administration, Mark H. Buzby, United States Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff:
Elias Yu
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
JY SH Double Entendre L.P. v. Harris et al
as 1:2018cv04869
Defendant:
City of New York Environmental Control Board, National Services, Inc., Symonous Harris and others
Plaintiff:
JY SH Double Entendre L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Whitfield et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv01232
Plaintiff:
Lorren Vincente Whitfield, Fruquana Karima Precious Whitfield, Fruquana Karima Precious Whitfield doing business as Fruquana Whitfield and others
Defendant:
P.S. 28, Dionne Lowery, Maria Zubair and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cassidy v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv04187
Plaintiff:
Landon Cassidy
Defendant:
Department of Transportation, United States Merchant Marine Academy and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hearn v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv03703
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, James A. Helis, Michael Stroud and others
Plaintiff:
John B. Hearn
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
