Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2018cv81760
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mulville et al v. Lifelink Foundation, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02779
Defendant:
Lifelink Foundation Inc., Does 1-200, Daniel Schultz and others
Plaintiff:
H. L. M., Estate of Duane Mulville, Duane Mulville and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Seikaly v. Black Shopping Channel, Inc.,
as 1:2018mc23460
Plaintiff:
William R Seikaly
Defendant:
Black Shopping Channel, Inc.,
BLACK v. GBS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 5:2017cv00309
Plaintiff:
EQUILLA BLACK
Defendant:
GBS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and GBS INTERNATIONAL, INC. doing business as WORLD QUEST TRAVEL CLUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Coy v. No Limits Education and Athletic Development, Inc et al
as 8:2017mc00118
Plaintiff:
John A. Coy
Defendant:
No Limits Education and Athletic Development, Inc, Shawn Black and Craig Woodcroft
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services INC. et al
as 1:2017mc21576
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
AMG Services INC., Red Cedar Services, Inc., MNE Services, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Li et al v. Walsh, et al
as 9:2016cv81871
Plaintiff:
LAN LI , YING TAN , TAO XIONG and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH WALSH, JOSEPH WALSH, JR., J. MARCUS PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
