Cases 11 - 20 of 43
MUSSEL WHITE v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as NJ/3:16-cv-01700
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN MUSSEL WHITE and FRANKLIN MUSSELWHITE
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC. and others
Peterson et al v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as NYE/1:15-cv-07356
Plaintiff:
Mirriam A. Peterson and Ben Peterson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., , Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services and others
Johns v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as TXE/4:15-cv-00812
Plaintiff:
Laura K Johns
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Martin v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as MD/8:15-cv-03787
Plaintiff:
Preston O. Martin
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Ophoven v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as MN/4:15-md-02652
Plaintiff:
Janice Ophoven
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Phillips v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. et al
as LAE/2:15-cv-01310
Plaintiff:
Nidra L Phillips
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
JOHNSON v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as PAE/2:15-cv-00553
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR T. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY DIVISION OF ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. and others
WHITEHEAD et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as NJ/3:15-cv-03980
Plaintiff:
CARLA WHITEHEAD and JOE WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES and others
Shafer et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as KS/2:14-cv-02633
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Shafer and Doris Simpson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Phillips et al v. Ethicon Inc et al
as SC/7:15-cv-02114
Plaintiff:
Andrea Phillips and Kevin Phillips
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc , Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
