Cases 11 - 20 of 591
Elisha Thomas, Jr.In re: Elisha Thomas, Jr.
as 23-11755
Petitioner:
In re: ELISHA THOMAS, JR.
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Darryl Barwick v. Governor of Florida, et al
as 23-11277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL BRIAN BARWICK
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Richard LetiziaIn re: Richard Letizia
as 23-10083
Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD VINCENT LETIZIA
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
In re: Joseph Levin
as 22-13773
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH LUIS LEVIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kenneth Hartley v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13006
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH HARTLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: Doyle Heard
as 22-12866
Petitioner:
In re: DOYLE L. HEARD
Respondent:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MELINDA N. COONROD, Commissioner Secretary
Geovanny Padron v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et alIn re: Geovanny Padron v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12089
Petitioner:
In re: GEOVANNY PADRON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Valentin Sanchez
as 22-11668
Petitioner:
VALENTIN SANCHEZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
In re: Larry Pride
as 22-11296
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY PRIDE
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Timothy Sneed
as 22-10980
Petitioner:
In re: TIMOTHY SNEED
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
