Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Thomas Young v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC, et al
as 21-11845
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH, BEASLEY, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS YOUNG
David Zavala v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC, et al
as 21-11812
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT TOOLE, Director of Field Operations, REGIONAL DIRECTOR TAYLOR, GD&CP/SMU, WARDEN, GD&CP/SMU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ZAVALA
Richard Shelby v. Commissioner of the Georgia
as 21-11401
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD SHELBY
Daniel Cobble v. U.S. Government, et al
as 21-11281
Defendant / Appellee:
GDC COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAVACA JOHNSON, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Peter Edgehill v. Warden, et al
as 21-10547
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
PETER EDGEHILL
James Whiters v. Commissioner of the Georgia
as 21-10340
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES WHITERS
Anthony Herrington v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC
as 21-10309
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY HERRINGTON, a.k.a. Anthony Lamar Kitchens
Charles Carmichael v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC
as 21-10185
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES CARMICHAEL
Maurice Flournoy v. Commissioner of the GA DOC
as 20-14103
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAURICE FLOURNOY
Johnnie Culbreath v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC
as 20-13746
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHNNIE CULBREATH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
