Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Griffith et al v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2016cv02244
Plaintiff:
Amanda Griffith and Gary Alexander Rodriguez
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Director, Citizenship and Immigration Services, District Director, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Orlando, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Griffiths v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 0:2015cv61975
Plaintiff:
Andrew Griffiths
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv03238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cox et al v. Randazza Legal Group et al
as 1:2013cv21924
Defendant:
Michael Whiteacre, Randazza Legal Group, Marc J. Randazza and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal L. Cox and 1-50 John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
