Cases 11 - 20 of 101
HEDAYATI et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv02136
Plaintiff:
SALEH MOHAMMAD HEDAYATI , MAJD SHARAREH and HAMED HEDAYATI
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and F. GERARD HEINAUER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
KALHORO v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv01904
Plaintiff:
ABDUL HAFEEZ KALHORO
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and SARAH TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAJAGOPAL et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv01774
Plaintiff:
GANESH NARAYAN RAJAGOPAL and PUSHPA RADHAKRISHNA IYER
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ERIC HOLDER, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ALEXIS v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv01626
Plaintiff:
BAYNE ALEXIS
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ERIC HOLDER and BEATRICE WELTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DU et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv01540
Plaintiff:
ZHENZENG DU and MAPUCHE, LLC
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
TILAHUN v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv01525
Plaintiff:
WONDIMU TEDLA TILAHUN
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, II, JANET NAPOLITANO, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
TEBASO v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv01524
Plaintiff:
ZINASH TEBASO
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, II, JANET NAPOLITANO, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
RAYASAM et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv01530
Plaintiff:
VENKATA KRISHNA KUMAR RAYASAM and ANANDA LAKSHMI THALUPURU
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS and DAVID ROARK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
O'REILLY v. NAPOLITANO
as 1:2011cv01479
Plaintiff:
KELLIE J. O'REILLY
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
PATEL v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv01348
Plaintiff:
NIRAV KANAIYALAL PATEL
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS and SUSAN DIBBINS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
