Cases 11 - 20 of 230
Banks et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02226
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Banks and Michael Banks
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Todd et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02242
Plaintiff:
Mattie Todd and Ronnie Todd
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Gynecare Worldwide, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Fung v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02210
Plaintiff:
Joyce Fung
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Brieske et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02206
Plaintiff:
Dolores Brieske and Derek Brieske
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
VanStone v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02214
Plaintiff:
Blaine VanStone
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Endo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Williams et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02205
Plaintiff:
Nadia Williams and Brian Williams
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Ward et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02198
Plaintiff:
Mary Ward and Jeffrey S. Ward
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare Worldwide and others
Larimore et al v. Boston Scientific, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02218
Plaintiff:
Christy G. Larimore and Johnny Larimore
Defendant:
Boston Scientific, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Noblett et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02204
Plaintiff:
Sarah Noblett and Kristian Noblett
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02217
Plaintiff:
Linda Darleene Bell Johnson and Raymond F. Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
