Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Kaplan, et al. v. Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, et al.
as 1:2018cv01687
Plaintiff:
Chaim Kaplan
Defendant:
Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Kaplan University
as 1:2015cv06240
Plaintiff:
Yahonia Monique Martin
Defendant:
Kaplan University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv10424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Infotrack Information Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02054
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Infotrack Information Services, Inc. and Steve Kaplan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Hughes v. Accretive Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03688
Plaintiff:
Tiffany M Hughes and Pressure Controls, Inc.
Defendant:
Accretive Health, Inc., Mary A. Tolan, John T. Staton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Bennett et al v. Sterling Bay Companies and Affiliates et al
as 1:2012cv07412
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Bennett, Maeve M Bennett, Deirdre M Murray and others
Defendant:
Sterling Bay Companies and Affiliates, Sterling Bay Principals, Obama for America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kaplan v. Arctic Zero, Inc.
as 1:2012cv06825
Plaintiff:
Judy Kaplan
Defendant:
Arctic Zero, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Aguilar v. Natbony et al
as 1:2011cv06286
Plaintiff:
Ellen Aguilar
Defendant:
William Natbony , Thomas Kaplan and Dafna Kaplan
Material_witne:
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
