Cases 11 - 20 of 151
Gaus et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as WVN/5:17-cv-00177
Plaintiff:
Bryan Gaus and Danielle Gaus
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. and Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.
Dana Gold, et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 17-80246
Plaintiff - Respondent:
DANA GOLD, TAMMY EMERY, RUSSELL DORNON and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Dana Gold, et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 17-80246
Respondent:
DANA GOLD, TAMMY EMERY, RUSSELL DORNON and others
Petitioner:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Cockson et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as ALS/1:17-cv-00354
Plaintiff:
Jon Cockson and Tracy Cockson
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. , Lumber Liquidators Leasing, LLC , Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. and others
THOMAS et al v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC
as GAM/5:17-cv-00257
Plaintiff:
KATHY THOMAS and DAVID THOMAS
Defendant:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC
McHugh et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as NYE/2:17-cv-03666
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators and Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas McHugh , Brenda Jenkins , Darius Gandhi and others
Gaus et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as WVN/5:17-cv-00040
Plaintiff:
Bryan Gaus , Danielle Gaus , A.G. and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. and Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.
Christman v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as FLM/8:17-cv-00436
Plaintiff:
Julie Christman
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Balderson et al v. Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:16-cv-12701
Plaintiff:
Thomas Balderson and Barbara Balderson
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. , Lumber Liquidators, Inc. , Lumber Liquidators Leasing, LLC and others
Mitchem et al v. Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:16-cv-12699
Plaintiff:
Russell Mitchem and Wanda Mitchem
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. , Lumber Liquidators, Inc. , Lumber Liquidators Leasing, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
