Cases 11 - 20 of 1,160
Hoddick v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as HI/1:22-CV-00144
Plaintiff:
Hoddick and Jeffrey K. Hoddick
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. nka Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Soileau v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as LAM/3:22-CV-00210
Plaintiff:
Soileau and Nalon A. Soileau
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc, Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. nka Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Wagner et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as ILN/1:22-CV-01717
Plaintiff:
Wagner, Tanja Wagner and Scott Wagner
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. nka Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Counts v. Merck & Co. Inc et al
as TXN/4:22-CV-00241
Plaintiff:
Counts and Madeline A. Counts
Defendant:
Merck & Co. Inc, MERCK & CO., INC., and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. nka Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Landers et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as WVS/2:22-CV-00160
Plaintiff:
Landers, Elizabeth Landers and I. L.
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc, Merck & Co., Inc., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and others
Hendrix v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as GAN/1:22-CV-01171
Plaintiff:
Hendrix and Darby Hendrix
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc, Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Wingerter et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as GAN/1:22-CV-01178
Plaintiff:
Wingerter, Ken Wingerter and Shaun Wingerter
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc, Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Sydney Fetters v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as CAC/8:22-CV-00422
Plaintiff:
Sydney Fetters and S.F.
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc, Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Jacob Levy v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as CAC/8:22-CV-00431
Plaintiff:
Jacob Levy
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc, Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Eduardo Atjian, II v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as CAC/2:22-CV-01739
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Atjian, II and Eduardo Atjian II
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc, Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
