Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
First National Bank and Trust Company of Rochelle, Illinois v. The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv05693
Defendant:
The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc , Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC , Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
First National Bank and Trust Company of Rochelle, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Moody v. Springleaf Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05108
Defendant:
Springleaf Financial Services, Inc. and Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Shelby Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gutnayer v. Schaffer et al
as 1:2010cv06258
Plaintiff:
Jerry Gutnayer and Gutnayer and Associates Partnership
Defendant:
Don Schaffer, Glenn Gutnayer, Elaine Gutnayer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dexia Credit Local v. Rogan, et al
as 1:2002cv08288
Plaintiff:
Dexia Credit Local
Defendant:
Peter G Rogan and Bainbridge Management, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Dexia Credit Local
Movant:
United States of America , Posada Hoover Creek, LLC , Posada Palmetto, LLC and others
Respondent:
Winston & Strawn LLP
Intervenor_defendant:
Judith K. Rogan , Brian P. Rogan , Robert C Rogan and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Janet Pedlow
Intervenor:
Janet Pedlow and Margie Koltunski
Objector:
Burke Costanza & Cuppy, Gouveia & Associates, LLC and O'Rourke & Moody
Receiver:
Eugene Crane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Oakland County Employees' Retirement System v. Massaro et al
as 1:2009cv06284
Defendant:
George E. Massaro, Dubose Ashley, James D. Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Oakland County Employees' Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
