Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Orso v. Romero-Loaiza
as 8:2021mc00111
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso
Defendant:
Jorge Romero-Loaiza
Interested Party:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Federal Trade Commission v. Romero
as 5:2021cv00343
Defendant:
Frank Romero and Frank Romero doing business as Trend Deploy, Trendeploy, trendeploy, trendeploy.com, Frank Romero Advertising & Uvenuzx
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Zeya et al
as 8:2021cv01032
Defendant:
Alexis Del Sol Perez, L.M.T., Hasan Ismail Zeya, Palm Wellness Center, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00957
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00658
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Romero v. LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC et al
as 2:2021cv14094
Defendant:
Lakeview Loan Servicing and Central Loan Administration & Reporting doing business as Cenlar FSB
Plaintiff:
Daniel Romero
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Romero v. Cenlar FSB et al
as 2:2021cv14093
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB and Lakeview Loan Servicing
Plaintiff:
Daniel Romero
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Lanza v. State of Florida
as 1:2020cv22531
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Columbia Hospital Corp. Of Kendall, Juan Camilo Duque Ballesteros and others
Plaintiff:
Aleida Lanza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
