Cases 11 - 17 of 17
FISUN v. BLINKEN, et al
as 1:2023cv03261
Plaintiff:
Alexey Leonidovich Fisun
Defendant:
Antony J. Blinken, et al, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, JIM MULLINAX and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
PANFEROV v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03249
Plaintiff:
ALEXEY PANFEROV
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, DEPARTMENT OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JIM MULLINAX and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
BRODSKIY v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03224
Plaintiff:
Ilya Brodskiy
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, JIM MULLINAX, JANET YELLEN and others
Not Classified By Court:
STATE DEPARTMENT, United States Department of State Bureau of Economic Analysis and Business Affairs Office of Sanctions Policy and Implementation, TREASURY DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
KATRANGI v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv02930
Plaintiff:
AMIR KATRANGI
Defendant:
BRADLEY T. SMITH and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
NANGAA YOBELUO v. SMITH et al
as 1:2021cv02973
Plaintiff:
CORNEILLE NANGAA YOBELUO
Defendant:
BRADLEY T. SMITH, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
KATINTIMA v. SMITH et al
as 1:2021cv02917
Plaintiff:
NORBERT BASENGEZI KATINTIMA
Defendant:
OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and BRADLEY T. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
LOPEZ BELLO v. SMITH et al
as 1:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
Samark Jose Lopez Bello
Defendant:
OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and BRADLEY T. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
