Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06445
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bedrock v. Trans Union LLC et al
as 1:2020cv05171
Plaintiff:
Louis Bedrock
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Trans Union LLC, Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP doing business as Verizon Wireless and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07857
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04763
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless v. City of Peoria
as 1:2016cv01453
Plaintiff:
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Defendant:
City of Peoria
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Ung v. Universal Acceptance Corporation
as 1:2016cv10544
Plaintiff:
Spencer Ung
Defendant:
Universal Acceptance Corporation
Third_party_defendant:
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless v. City of Peoria et al
as 1:2016cv01337
Plaintiff:
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Defendant:
City of Peoria, City of Peoria Zoning Board of Appeals and City of Peoria Site Plan Review Board
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
