Cases 11 - 20 of 41
DEMARA v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-03152
Plaintiff:
TREVOR M. DEMARA
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
EATON v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-03164
Plaintiff:
NORMAN R. EATON
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
CHESNICK v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-03154
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY CHESNICK
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
BOATRIGHT v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-03115
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BOATRIGHT
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
SERRIN v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-02994
Plaintiff:
BRET SERRIN
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
BELL v. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-02995
Plaintiff:
ANNE BELL
Defendant:
HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
EVENDAHL v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-02993
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EVENDAHL
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
SIMPSON et al v. WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-02755
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SIMPSON and KRISANA
Defendant:
WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC., WOLTERS KLUWER UNITED STATES, INC. and PFIZER, INC.
FALK et al v. WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-02750
Plaintiff:
MARGARET FALK , MARA FALK and JOHN FALK
Defendant:
WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC., WOLTERS KLUWER UNITED STATES, INC. and PFIZER, INC.
CRISP et al v. WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-02756
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH CRISP and ALANA CRISP
Defendant:
WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC., WOLTERS KLUWER UNITED STATES, INC. and PFIZER, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
