Cases 11 - 20 of 37
In Re: Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018cv06785
In Re:
In Re: Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Cellino & Barnes, P.C., Walley's Auto Sales, Inc., Crowley Webb and Associates, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Tegna, Inc., Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., Hearst Communications, Inc. and others
Respondent:
The Nielsen Company (US), LLC
Special Master:
Richard Levie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Webb
as 1:2017cv08685
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
David Webb, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Webb v. 360 Digital Marketing, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv07265
Plaintiff:
Ralanda Webb
Defendant:
360 Digital Marketing, LLC, Reckon Media, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Webb v. Sprite Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06578
Plaintiff:
Ralanda Webb
Defendant:
Sprite Entertainment, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Webb et al v. Medicredit
as 1:2016cv11125
Plaintiff:
Lisa Webb and Jason Webb
Defendant:
Medicredit
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Webb, Jr. v. JH Portfolio Debt Equities, LLC
as 1:2016cv04489
Plaintiff:
Verlon Webb, Jr.
Defendant:
JH Portfolio Debt Equities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
