Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Alan Bartlett v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 20-15933
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALAN M. BARTLETT
Alan Bartlett v. State Bar of California, et al
as 20-15914
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA and PHILLIP TREVINO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN M. BARTLETT
Alan Bartlett v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 20-15824
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALAN M. BARTLETT
Alan Bartlett v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 20-15623
Defendant:
MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MARICOPA COUNTY CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT and CHRIS DEROSE
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE and JEFF FINE, Maricopa County Clerk of Court
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN M. BARTLETT
Alan Bartlett v. State Bar of California, et al
as 20-15366
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA and PHILLIP TREVINO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN M. BARTLETT
Alan Bartlett v. Paul Penzone
as 20-15017
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALAN M. BARTLETT
Alan Bartlett v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 19-17512
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALAN M. BARTLETT
Alan Bartlett v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 19-17484
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALAN M. BARTLETT
Alan Bartlett v. State of Arizona, et al
as 19-17482
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALAN M. BARTLETT, named as: Alan M Bartlett and Alan Bartlett/ Appellant
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Alan Bartlett v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Offi, et al
as 19-17475
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE, CLERK OF COURT, MARICOPA COUNTY, MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN M. BARTLETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
