Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Adrian Stewart v. Leon Bolling, et al
as 20-13792
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADRIAN STEWART
Respondent / Appellee:
LEON BOLLING, Warden, STEVEN T. MARSHALL, The Attorney General of the State of Alabama, WARDEN and others
Reginald Holt v. Warden, et al
as 20-13252
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA and WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
REGINALD LENOIR HOLT
Robert Baise, Jr. v. Johnathon Horton, et al
as 20-12437
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT BAISE, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA and JOHNATHON HORTON, Sheriff
Demitrius Alexander v. Warden, et al
as 20-11997
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, HEADLEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEMITRIUS WAYNE ALEXANDER
In re: William Sullivan
as 20-12590
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM SULLIVAN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Robert Gill v. Warden, et al
as 19-12728
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT C. GILL
In re: Labearrian Pitts
as 20-11488
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner:
In re: LABEARRIAN PITTS
James Wallace v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 20-10789
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD WALLACE
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, III and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Benjamin Barber v. State of Oregon, et al
as 20-35051
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN BARBER
Defendant:
SIMON, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon and ACOSTA, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon
In re: Silas Martin
as 20-10157
Not Yet Classified:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner:
In re: SILAS MARTIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
