Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Sears Home & Business Franchises, Inc. v. MRL Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10908
Petitioner:
Sears Home & Business Franchises, Inc.
Respondent:
MRL Services, Inc., BTZ, Inc., OPM Carpet, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holt Healthcare Management Services, Inc. v. Annexmed Billing Service, Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv07554
Defendant:
Annexmed Billing Service and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Holt Healthcare Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Busbice et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2016mc02002
Plaintiff:
Bill A Busbice, Jr , Olla Productions LLC and Ecibsub LLC
Defendant:
James David Williams and Steven J Brown
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Busbice v. Williams
as 1:2016cv03749
Plaintiff:
Bill A. Busbice
Defendant:
James David Williams
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Sabbia v. The Alternative Billing Service et al
as 1:2015cv06736
Plaintiff:
John Sabbia
Defendant:
The Alternative Billing Service , Don Speilman , Advanced Health Institute LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago v. Bill Prewitt
as 1:2015cv02088
Plaintiff:
Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago
Defendant:
Bill Prewitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reynolds v. Bonneville Billing and Collections Inc
as 3:2014cv00999
Plaintiff:
Donald R Reynolds
Defendant:
Bonneville Billing and Collections Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Suh v. Physician Billing Associates, Inc.
as 1:2014cv03590
Plaintiff:
Dong Suh
Defendant:
Physician Billing Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DIRECTV, LLC v. Meadowcroft et al
as 1:2014cv03363
Defendant:
Sara Meadowcroft, Baby Joe's LLC and Bill Thill
Plaintiff:
DirectTV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
