Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Reflex Media, Inc. v. Doe No. 1 et al
as 2:2018cv02423
Defendant:
Doe No. 1, Arman Ali, Marca Global, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Reflex Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Acumen Assessments et al
as 2:2018cv02101
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
John Doe and Acumen Assessments
Defendant:
Center for Personalized Education for Physicians
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01275
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
A. Doe et al v. Ludwigsen et al
as 2:2018ms00021
Plaintiff:
A. Doe, E. Doe, K. Doe and others
Defendant:
Amanda Aikens, Taylor Brown, Karen Davie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
A. Doe et al v. Ludwigsen et al
as 2:2018cv00564
Plaintiff:
M. Doe, K. Doe, Y. Doe and others
Defendant:
Kurt Ludwigsen, Michael G. Scales, Kirsten Lambertson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Doe et al
as 2:2018cv00554
Defendant:
Amands Aikens, Taylor Brown, Karen Davie and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
John Doe, et al v. Oesterblad
as 3:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
David Ellis and John Doe, et al
Interested Party:
Brent Oesterblad
Defendant:
Charles Rodrick
Cable News Network, Inc. et al v. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
as 2:2017cv02775
Petitioner:
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Associated Press, Cable News Network, Inc. and others
Respondent:
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
In Re:
Sealed Warrants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
John Doe, et al v. Oesterblad
as 3:2017ms00008
Plaintiff:
John Doe, et al
Defendant:
Brent Oesterblad
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01588
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
