Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Al Yafai v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv05007
Plaintiff:
AHMED AL YAFAI
Defendant:
Acting Director Chad Wolf, Mike Pompeo, Thomas M Cioppa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Mabie v. US Attorneys Office et al
as 3:2018cv01939
Defendant:
FBI, US Bureau of Prisons and US Attorneys Office
Plaintiff:
William Mabie
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
United States of America v. The items logged in evidence under FBI case number 305A-CG-6383697
as 1:2015mc00422
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The items logged in evidence under FBI case number 305A-CG-6383697
United States of America v. The black Sony Experia Android T-Mobile cellular telephone, currently in the custody the FBI
as 1:2015mc00283
Plaintiff:
United States of America and The black Sony Experia Android T-Mobile cellular telephone, currently in the custody the FBI
Pearson et al v. HSBC Bank et al
as 3:2010cv00959
Plaintiff:
Donna K Pearson and Frank T Pearson
Defendant:
HSBC Bank, HSBC Auto Finance, Santander Consumer USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Brodzki v. FBI
as 1:2009cv06604
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Brodzki
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Brodzki v. FBI
as 1:2009cv05925
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Brodzki
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Papyrus of Growth and Development Printing, Inc. et al v. FBI
as 1:2009cv03256
Petitioner:
Norman C Green, Jr
Respondent:
FBI, David M. Hardy, Richard L Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Singh v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2008cv50171
Plaintiff:
Sandeep Singh
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen, Donald Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Balcina v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv04400
Plaintiff:
Merlynda A. Balcina and Merlynda A. Balcina
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen, Ruth Dorochoff and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
