Other Statutes Cases filed in New York
Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Giordano et al v. Saks Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00833
Defendant: Louis Vuitton USA Inc., Prada USA Corp., Brunello Cucinelli USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Ying-Liang Wang, Susan Giordano, Angelene Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Bijlmer v. WildHorse Resource Development Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00511
Defendant: Tony R. Weber, Scott A. Gieselman, Jay C. Graham and others
Plaintiff: Johan Bijlmer
Bushansky v. Wildhorse Resource Development Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00381
Defendant: Tony R. Weber, Scott A. Gieselman, Jay C. Graham and others
Plaintiff: Stephen Bushansky
Burley v. Wildhorse Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00036
Defendant: Tony R. Weber, Jay C. Graham, Wildhorse Therapeutics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: John Burely
Barrera et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11624
Plaintiff: Erick Schmidt, Paul Carney, Walter Lopez and others
Defendant: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Actisdano et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11504
Plaintiff: Michael Mcelroy, Daniel Wiese, Gina Tripoli and others
Defendant: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Gusick et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2018cv06467
Plaintiff: Stephen J. Hayes, John Misoulis, Kevin Dorry and others
Defendant: The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01288
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ma v. Patheon N.V. et al
as 1:2017cv04979
Defendant: Patheon N.V. , Daniel Agroskin , Charles Cogut and others
Plaintiff: Di Ma
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bushansky v. Patheon N.V. et al
as 1:2017cv04758
Plaintiff: Stephen Bushansky
Defendant: Patheon N.V. , Paul S. Levy , James C. Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?