Cases 21 - 30 of 60
DINGLE et al v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as NJ/2:14-cv-03572
Plaintiff:
EDDIE J. DINGLE, JR. and KARLYN C. DINGLE
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DEPUY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
CASARI et al v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as NJ/2:14-cv-03571
Plaintiff:
JOAN CASARI and RICHARD CASARI
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DEPUY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Johnson v. Pfizer Inc et al
as LAW/3:14-cv-00926
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , Jane Doe Distributors, John Doe Drug Co and others
OXSHEER et al v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-02391
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ROBERT OXSHEER, JR. and VIRGINIA LEE OXSHEER
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. , ABBVIE INC. , AUXILIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Guilbeau v. Abbott Laboratories Inc et al
as LAW/6:14-cv-00864
Plaintiff:
Rodney Guilbeau and Catina Guilbeau
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories Inc , AbbVie Inc , Pfizer Inc and others
BOYD v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as NJ/2:13-cv-06365
Plaintiff:
JANET BOYD
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , BAYER PHARMA AG , BARR LABORATORIES, INC. and others
KOCH v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as NJ/2:14-cv-02351
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. KOCH
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DEPUY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
GERARD et al v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as NJ/2:14-cv-01660
Plaintiff:
KAREN GERARD and TIMOTHY GERARD
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DEPUY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
THOMPSON v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as NJ/2:13-cv-07158
Plaintiff:
THELMA THOMPSON
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DEPUY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
MADDEN et al v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as NJ/2:12-cv-06134
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH T. MADDEN, III and JOAN M. MADDEN
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DEPUY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
