Cases 21 - 30 of 176
DDS Lab, LLC v. Cadmus Dental Lab, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01050
Plaintiff:
DDS Lab, LLC
Defendant:
Cadmus Dental Lab, Inc., Kelly L. Rivera, Jonathan Boyd-Rivera and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Patrick et al v. Delta Airlines, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick and Jerricka Kelly
Defendant:
Delta Airlines, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ML Fashion, LLC et al v. Nobelle GW LLC et al
as 8:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
ML Fashion, LLC and ML Retail, LLC
Defendant:
Nobelle GW LLC, Stephanie Menkin, Nicolas Goureau and others
Respondent:
Kelly DiLascia
ML Fashion, LLC et al v. Nobelle GW LLC et al
as 8:2022mc00003
Plaintiff:
ML Fashion, LLC and ML Retail, LLC
Defendant:
Nobelle GW LLC, Stephanie Menkin, Nicolas Goureau and others
Respondent:
Kelly DiLascia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re VeneQuip, S.A.
as 1:2021mc23754
In Re:
VeneQuip, S.A.
Respondent:
Kelly Tractor Co. and Pantropic Power, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
v. Kelly Tractor Co. et al
as 1:2021cv23754
Respondent:
Kelly Tractor Co. and Pantropic Power, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
United States Sugar Corporation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 9:2021cv81506
Plaintiff:
United States Sugar Corporation
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Christine E. Wormuth, Jaime A. Pinkham and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
