Cases 21 - 30 of 751
REDDEN et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
TRAMELL REDDEN, PRINCESS T REDDEN, RYAN O AGHOGHO and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE PHONE NUMBER SERVICED BY AT&T CORPORATION
as 1:2023ml00091
In Re:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE PHONE NUMBER SERVICED BY AT&T CORPORATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN RE APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE PHONE NUMBER SERVICED BY AT&T CORPORATION
as 1:2022ml01376
In Re:
IN RE APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE PHONE NUMBER SERVICED BY AT&T CORPORATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv02377
Plaintiff:
John T Hansen and NO PARTY
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
DOBKIN v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2022cv02213
Plaintiff:
ADIN T. DOBKIN
Defendant:
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
GRAHAM v. WILLIS et al
as 1:2022mc00068
In Re:
Honorable FANI T. WILLIS and CERTIFICATE OF MATERIAL WITNESS
Not Classified By Court:
LINDSEY GRAHAM and ANITA JOSEY-HERRING
Petitioner:
LINDSEY O. GRAHAM
Respondent:
FANI T. WILLIS
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2022cv02032
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
GOSOLAR LLC v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 1:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
GOSOLAR and GOSOLAR LLC
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
BROCKMAN v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2022cv01254
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. BROCKMAN
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
