Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Kuhn v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2016rj00001
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., JMK Entertainment, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua (I) Kuhn
Counter_claimant:
Chase Bank, USA, N.A.
Cross_defendant:
Joshua (I) Kuhn
Darrell v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
as 1:2015cv02446
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Darrell Vigil
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ladouceur et al v. Wells Fargo et al
as 1:2015cv02080
Plaintiff:
Donald Ladouceur and Lisa Ladouceur
Defendant:
Wells Fargo , Wells Fargo Bank , Wells Fargo & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Maehr v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue et al
as 1:2015mc00127
Petitioner:
Jeffrey T. Maehr
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Ginger L. Wray and Wells Fargo Bank, NA
USA v. $30,630.00 in Wells Fargo Account # 3272385182, held in the names of Mark DeJesus and Lynette Schwab
as 1:2015mc00052
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
$30,630.00 in Wells Fargo Account # 3272385182, held in the names of Mark DeJesus and Lynette Schwab
USA v. $31,073.46 in Wells Fargo Account # 2426562829, held in the name of Mark DeJesus
as 1:2015mc00051
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
$31,073.46 in Wells Fargo Account # 2426562829, held in the name of Mark DeJesus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
