Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Johnson v. Melton Truck Lines, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv08817
Plaintiff:
David M. Johnson
Defendant:
Melton Truck Lines, INC., Robert A. Peterson, Michael Dargel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gholson v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc.
as 1:2014cv08405
Plaintiff:
Rosie Gholson
Defendant:
Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grok Lines, Inc. v. Paschall Truck Lines, Inc.
as 1:2014cv08033
Plaintiff:
Grok Lines, Inc.
Defendant:
Paschall Truck Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Iosello v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06118
Plaintiff:
Christopher Iosello
Defendant:
Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc. and Travel Rewards, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gordon v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05848
Plaintiff:
Richard Gordon
Defendant:
Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc. and Travel Rewards, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Federal Insurance Company v. The Mason and Dixon Lines, Inc.
as 1:2014cv05773
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Mason and Dixon Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Johnson v. Melton Truck Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04294
Plaintiff:
David M Johnson
Defendant:
Melton Truck Lines, Inc., Great West Casualty Co., Robert A Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mervyn v. Atlas Van Lines Inc et al
as 1:2013cv03587
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mervyn
Defendant:
Atlas Van Lines Inc and Ace World Wide Moving & Storage Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Volpe v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01646
Plaintiff:
Mark Volpe
Defendant:
Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc. and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
