Other Statutes Cases filed in Florida
Cases 31 - 40 of 519
Movsas v. Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv23794
Plaintiff: Lisa Sharon Movsas
Defendant: UR M JADDOU, Alejandro Marorkas, Alyssa Emmel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Castillo Castillo et al v. Mendoza Jaddou et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2022cv81692
Plaintiff: Jose Edgard Castillo Castillo and Boca Properties LLC
Defendant: Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, MERRICK GARLAND, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
ANGARITA DE BREWER et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv23200
Plaintiff: Maria Mercedes ANGARITA DE BREWER, JOSEPH MATHIAS BREWER GUTIERREZ, Joseph Mathias BREWER ANGARITA and others
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Kane et al v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 9:2022cv81287
Plaintiff: Brian Patrick Kane, Zayne Aneed Elias Otero, Camilo Andres Orozco Elias and others
Defendant: Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND, Gabriel Gonzalez, Director Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Da Costa et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 9:2022cv81138
Plaintiff: Paulo Da Costa and Viviane Medeiros
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security;, Attorney General of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cousins et al v. School Board of Orange County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01312
Plaintiff: Jennifer Cousins, Matthew Cousins, P.C., and others
Defendant: School Board of Orange County, School Board of Indian River County, School Board of Duval County, Florida and others
Intervenor Defendant: Attorney General of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Graham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00655
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission and Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs
Defendant: Treashonna P. Graham a/k/a Shonna Graham a/k/a Treashonna Lee Williams a/k/a/ Shonna Lee Williams d/b/a The Grant Bae, Grant Bae, and Grant Bae Consulting and More, individually and as a member, manager, or owner of C Lee Enterprises LLC, C Lee Enterprises LLC a Florida limited liability company doing business as Grant Bae and Grant Bae Consulting and More, Treashonna P. Graham a/k/a Treasonna Davis, a/k/a Shonna Graham a/k/a Treashonna Lee Williams a/k/a/ Shonna Lee Williams d/b/a The Grant Bae, Grant Bae, and Grant Bae Consulting and More, individually and as a member, manager, or owner of C Lee Enter and others
Receiver: Mark J. Bernet
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53 Federal Trade Commission Act
Spence v. Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 0:2022cv60806
Plaintiff: Andre Cleto Spence, Jr
Defendant: Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Cader v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2022cv21273
Plaintiff: Mohamed Jawahar Cader
Defendant: Attorney General of the United States, Secretary Of State, Secretary Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
CABRERA v. GARLAND et al
as 9:2022cv80558
Plaintiff: CARLOS ORLANDO CABRERA
Defendant: U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND, Deputy Director TRACY RENAUD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?