Cases 31 - 40 of 557
EVANS-THOMAS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as NJ/2:18-cv-11114
Plaintiff:
JOHNETTA EVANS-THOMAS
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
CRAWFORD v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as NJ/2:18-cv-11115
Plaintiff:
DANA ALAN CRAWFORD
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
Miears v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as NYS/1:18-cv-02744
Plaintiff:
Kelley Miears
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and McKesson Corporation
McCugh v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as NYS/1:18-cv-02893
Plaintiff:
Cyndy McCugh
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and McKesson Corporation
Nelson v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as NYS/1:18-cv-02643
Plaintiff:
Cathy Nelson
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and McKesson Corporation
JONES et al v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as NJ/2:18-cv-10313
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS JONES and TAMMY JONES
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP., PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Watts v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as TXN/3:18-cv-01400
Plaintiff:
Alice Watts
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Davis v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as NYS/1:18-cv-02896
Plaintiff:
Mark Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Brown v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as OKN/4:18-CV-00190
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Brown
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and McKesson Corporation
Butler v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as NYS/1:18-cv-02913
Plaintiff:
James Butler
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Astrazeneca Pharmaceutical LP and Astrazeneca LP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
