Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schultz v. Bright House Networks, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv02897
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Schultz
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC and Credit Protection Association, L.P.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Sliwa v. Bright House Networks, LLC
as 8:2015cv02898
Plaintiff:
Stephan H. Sliwa
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Sliwa v. Bright House Networks, LLC
as 2:2016cv00235
Plaintiff:
Stephan H. Sliwa
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Federal Trade Commission v. Sun Bright Ventures, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv02153
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Sun Bright Ventures, LLC , Citadel ID Pro, LLC , Benjamin Todd Workman and others
Cross_claimant:
Benjamin Todd Workman , Sun Bright Ventures, LLC and Citadel ID Pro, LLC
Cross_defendant:
Glenn Erikson and Trident Consulting Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Bright v. Viking Client Services, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jean Bright
Defendant:
Viking Client Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bright v. MFP, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00652
Plaintiff:
Jean Bright
Defendant:
MFP, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bright v. Diverisifed Adjustment Service, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00458
Plaintiff:
Jean Bright
Defendant:
Diverisifed Adjustment Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Bright v. First Financial Asset Management, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00450
Plaintiff:
Jean Bright
Defendant:
First Financial Asset Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
