Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Rolain v. Liggett et al
as 2:2013cv00800
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Rolain
Defendant:
Yolanda Gayle Liggett, Lafferty, Freeman, Rolain & Company, J & DY Automation Robotics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goble v. Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, LLP et al
as 6:2012cv01125
Plaintiff:
Richard Goble
Defendant:
Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, LLP, Peter Anderson, Keith J. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 0101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Trinity Biotech, Inc. v. Reidy et al
as 2:2011mc00017
Plaintiff:
Trinity Biotech, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas Reidy, Howard Hatfield, Raymond Freeman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Taliaferro et al v. ERG Enterprises, LP et al
as 3:2011cv00199
Plaintiff:
Todd Taliaferro , Maureen Taliaferro , Arthur M. Maciag and others
Defendant:
ERG Enterprises, LP , Lubert-Adler Management Company, LP , Lubert-Adler Real Estate Fund III, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lhota v. Perez et al
as 2:2010cv00763
Plaintiff:
William G. Lhota
Defendant:
Clotilde Perez, Zenaida Perez, Timothy T. Lainhart and others
Counter_claimant:
Daniel McMahon
Counter_defendant:
William G. Lhota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BDO Seidman LLP et al v. Freeman
as 1:2010cv21635
Appellant:
BDO Seidman LLP and Sandor Lenner
Appellee:
Lewis B Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Walsh-Duffy et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv20331
Plaintiff:
Angela Walsh-Duffy and Brett Freeman
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
