Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Gombau v. Galectin Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01287
Defendant:
Jack W. Callicutt, James C. Czirr, Galectin Therapeutics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Garcia Gombau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re Galectin Therapeutics, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 3:2014cv00399
Defendant:
Gilbert F. Amelio, Jack W. Callicutt, James C. Czirr and others
Plaintiff:
Marissa Ballesteros, Bradford C. Gelzayd, Jesus Garcia Gombau and others
In Re:
Galectin Therapeutics, Inc. Securities Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garcia-Ochoa v. USA
as 3:2013cv00509
Plaintiff:
Juan Garcia-Ochoa
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garcia-Magana v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC.,
as 2:2013cv00745
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Genesis Garcia-Magana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Not Used
as 2:2013cv00743
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Genesis Garcia-Mangana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Not Used
as 2:2013cv00744
Plaintiff:
Genesis Garcia-Mangana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Not Used
as 2:2013cv00734
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC and Genesis Garcia-Magana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garcia v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00733
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc. and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ariel H. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NOT USED
as 2:2013cv00512
Plaintiff:
Genesis Garcia-Mangana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NOT USED
as 2:2013cv00511
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Corporation, LLC
Plaintiff:
Genesis Garcia-Mangana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
