Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv07709
Plaintiff:
Kathy Noble
Defendant:
AFAM Concept Inc. dba JF Labs Inc., Dabur International LTD USA Inc., Dabur International Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv08702
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, HOUSE OF CHEATHAM, LLC, Loreal USA Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abellard-Beaubrun v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al
as ILN/1:23-CV-14612
Plaintiff:
Marie Abellard-Beaubrun
Defendant:
AFAM Concept Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Loreal USA Inc and others
Abrahamson v. Loreal USA, Inc et al
as ILN/1:23-CV-12929
Plaintiff:
Maria Abrahamson
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc, Loreal USA Products, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and others
Adama v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as ILN/1:23-CV-13263
Plaintiff:
Sheila Adama
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Adams v. Loreal USA, Inc et al
as ILN/1:23-CV-12525
Plaintiff:
Deborah Adams
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc, LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Adams v. Revlon et al
as ILN/1:23-CV-13653
Plaintiff:
Mary Adams
Defendant:
Revlon, Revlon Inc, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and others
Acosta-Wiseman v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs Inc. et al
as ILN/1:23-CV-11849
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Acosta-Wiseman
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc.,, HOUSE OF CHEATHAM, LLC and others
Abraham v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as ILN/1:23-CV-08949
Plaintiff:
Dehavilland Abraham
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv06052
Plaintiff:
Margaret Livermore
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
