Cases 31 - 38 of 38
SAN PASQUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS v. SALAZAR et al
as 1:2009cv01716
Plaintiff:
SAN PASQUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Defendant:
KEN SALAZAR, LARRY ECHO HAWK, DALE MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
BRYANT et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2009cv01637
Plaintiff:
ERIC BRYANT and JOAN BRYANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, DOUGLAS SHULMAN, DENNIS L. PARIZEK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
FARRELL et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00931
Plaintiff:
BERNETTA FARRELL, MARLANA MATTHEWS, CRYSTAL MCCOY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
BOOSE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00355
Plaintiff:
ANGELA BOOSE, STACEY CARTER, ANGELA GAY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
THOMAS et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00231
Plaintiff:
KANISHA THOMAS, ANGELA HINES, ITZETHT TESTA-SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LOPEZ et al v. COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv01989
Plaintiff:
RENE ARTURO LOPEZ, AQUILLA A.D. TURNER, MOHAMMED BARAKATULLAH ABDUSSALAAM and others
Defendant:
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC., JOHN DOE COMPANIES 1-50, ZAHARA INVESTMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
OLIVER v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2008cv00034
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY OLIVER
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
BRIDIE et al v. ADLER et al
as 1:2007cv01634
Plaintiff:
THERESA BRIDIE and STELLA STORM
Defendant:
GARY C. ADLER, ROBERT M. ADLER, ALLISON ILENE BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
