Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Lazar v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07546
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lazar
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jordan et al v. Camelot Information Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06261
Plaintiff:
Barry C. Jordan and Tom J. Lyness
Defendant:
Camelot Information Systems, Inc., Yiming Ma, Heidi Chou and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Savitt v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04648
Plaintiff:
Howard Savitt
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc v. Hotton
as 1:2012mc00187
Plaintiff:
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc
Defendant:
Mark C Hotton
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Brinckerhoff v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04312
Plaintiff:
Peter Brinckerhoff
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Lazard v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04252
Plaintiff:
Justin F. Lazard
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Lightman v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04184
Plaintiff:
Douglas M. Lightman
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Twining v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04099
Plaintiff:
Maren Twining
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , Sheryl K. Sandberg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Fox v. Camelot Information Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00086
Plaintiff:
Michael Fox
Defendant:
Camelot Information Systems, Inc., Yiming Ma, Heidi Chou and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., v. Apoorva Bhagwat
as 1:2011mc00371
Petitioner:
Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.,
Respondent:
Apoorva Bhagwat
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
