Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 9:2016cv81864
Plaintiff:
Taffini A Reed
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv22728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Reed v. Hollister Co.
as 1:2015cv21580
Plaintiff:
Lakedrick Reed
Defendant:
Hollister Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. State Attorney for the Seventh Judicial Circuit et al
as 3:2014cv01482
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Reed
Defendant:
State Attorney for the Seventh Judicial Circuit , Flagler County Sheriff's Office , Flagler County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv22405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed v. Morgan Drexen, Inc.
as 0:2013cv61440
Defendant:
Morgan Drexen, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marelys P. Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
R&R Bond Galleries, Inc. et al v. Ziegenfuss et al
as 8:2012cv02825
Plaintiff:
R&R Bond Galleries, Inc., Rodin International, Inc. and Robert Preiss
Defendant:
Robert Ziegenfuss, Lourdes Ziegenfuss and Reed V. Horth
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Daedalus Capital LLC et al v. Vinecombe et al
as 8:2012cv02533
Plaintiff:
Daedalus Capital LLC and Lockwood Technology Corporation
Defendant:
Bradford Vinecombe , Bruno Reigl , Adam Vinecombe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dickinson et al v. State Of Florida
as 8:2012mc00113
Plaintiff:
Shohreh Iravani Dickinson and John Reed Dickinson
Defendant:
State Of Florida
Daedalus Capital LLC et al v. Vinecombe et al
as 9:2012cv80495
Plaintiff:
Daedalus Capital LLC and Lockwood Technology Corporation
Defendant:
Bradford Vinecombe, Bruno Reigl, Adam Vinecombe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
