Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. City Of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv08149
Plaintiff:
Vince Davis, Sr
Defendant:
City Of Chicago Police Department, LeRoy Martin, Bradford Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Smith v. Blithfield Development, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03931
Plaintiff:
Darryl Smith
Defendant:
Blithfield Development, Inc. and Russell Swanson
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Holt v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv08062
Plaintiff:
Michelle Holt
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. and Russell Fuchs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Evans et al v. Wasendorf et al
as 1:2012cv07365
Plaintiff:
William Robert Evans , Willow Trustees Limited , Kirk Houghton and others
Defendant:
Russell R Wasendorf, Sr, Russell R. Wasendorf, Jr, Neil J Aslin and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6
Modi v. Wasendorf et al
as 1:2012cv06985
Plaintiff:
Gobind Modi
Defendant:
Russell R Wasendorf, Sr, Russell R. Wasendorf, Jr, Neil J. Aslin and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6
Alexander v. Wasendorf, Sr. et al
as 1:2012cv06390
Plaintiff:
Mark Alexander
Defendant:
Russell Wasendorf, Sr., Russell Wasendorf, Jr., Neil J. Aslin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ibrahim v. Wasendorf, Sr. et al
as 1:2012cv06137
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ibrahim
Defendant:
Russell Wasendorf, Sr., Russell Wasendorf Jr., Neil J. Aslin and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
