Cases 31 - 40 of 68
United States of America v. Twenty-Nine Pre-Columbian and Colonial Artifacts from Peru
as 1:2014mc00033
Defendant:
Twenty-Nine Pre-Columbian and Colonial Artifacts from Peru
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Miscellaneou:
David Walker and Walker Textile Conservation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Jordan
as 1:2014mc00022
Respondent:
Rosalie A. Jordan
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Plummer-Joe
as 1:2014mc00020
Respondent:
Nedra A. Plummer-Joe
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Hamilton v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hamilton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
G.R. v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00009
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Indian Health Service and others
Plaintiff:
G.R.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
United States of America v. 2010 Audi Q7
as 1:2013mc00047
Defendant:
2010 Audi Q7
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Higginson
as 1:2013mc00039
Respondent:
Robert W. Higginson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Gauba
as 1:2013mc00038
Respondent:
Haroon Razzak Gauba
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Navajo Agricultural Products Industry v. United States of America
as 1:2013mc00034
Petitioner:
Navajo Agricultural Products Industry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Adams v. United States of America
as 1:2013mc00033
Petitioner:
Robert E Adams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
